I’d pretty much made the decision to stop blogging and then THAT game had to go and happen. Despite experiencing a sinking feeling that only Atlantis could empathise with and sharing periods of incandescent rage at our fallibility with almost every other Canary fan, I’m in no rush to forget our last-gasp defeat to Liverpool.
I understand the frustration, we came from behind and put ourselves in a position to win the game, 3-1 up at home and you’d be forgiven for almost relaxing in your yellow plastic seat – it should be job done.
That’s just not the way with this Norwich side though. We started the season with an attacking mentality, a desire to take the game to the opposition, commit players forward and overload numbers by utilising our full-backs in the attacking third. It worked reasonably well. We won some, lost more and drew enough to keep the points tally ticking over and then we got thumped at Newcastle.
That game – much like the one against Liverpool – could have ended with a final score more akin to a Rugby Union match but, again like yesterday, we found ourselves on the wrong end of a high scoring defeat. Post-Newcastle we adopted a more conservative approach and were pragmatic to the point of being Hughtonesque. As a result, we conceded fewer goals, job done? Well, no. We were also far less of a threat to the opposition, created fewer chances and the results didn’t improve either. We were still losing games.
Recently, we’ve returned to something more akin to our early season methodology and we’ve been all the better for it, certainly aesthetically, winning a few games and causing some upsets along the way.
The Liverpool game was exceedingly close to being another of those. Ok, Liverpool aren’t the force of the 80s, they don’t even have Gerrard and Suarez anymore, but the day we start as favourites against them is still some way off; if we beat them it’s still regarded as an upset. That’s probably best put into perspective by the fact that we haven’t beaten them since that famous last day in front of the Kop.
This time though there would be no humble, whimpering surrender as they thump us 5 or 6 scoring goals from each and every corner and a range that they should need a sat-nav from, no, THIS time we went for the jugular (best way to kill a circus, that).
We started brightly, committed in the tackle, closing and harrying and were the better side right up until Firmino sprung a flimsy off-side trap and scuffed the ball in off the post. Despite the setback, we continued to play on the front foot, something that a line-up including Wes, Redmond, Mbokani and Naismith surely demanded. Our endeavour was rewarded as Martin kept a deep corner alive at the far post and when Liverpool failed to clear effectively Mbokani used his strength and ingenuity to manufacture a splendid back-heeled leveller. It soon got even better as Wes and Naismith spoiled us with some sublime interaction before our newest Scottish recruit thumped the ball into the corner.
After the break, Wes made it 3-1 from the spot and the crowd were in raptures for about a minute. Almost immediately we were pegged back though as Henderson swept home in the kind of isolation only the bloke cutting the grass would experience.
At 3-2, some might argue that we should have returned to a more pragmatic outlook, made negative substitutions (imagine that after the stick Hughton used to get!!) and looked to kill the game. The problem is, we’ve amply demonstrated already this season that we don’t have the personnel to do so and certainly not when we are Tetteyless. So we continued to attempt to play with the verve and swagger that had put us 3-1 up. Unfortunately, as we’ve seen against Palace, Leicester, Newcastle and others, our commitment to our forward sorties leaves us vulnerable to the quick break. Lose the ball high up the pitch, a switch of play, two more passes, defenders stranded up-field and others dragged out of position leave somebody with a simple tap in. This time it was Firmino again. In fairness, it was a good goal. The final ball and finish were exquisite but again, poor decision making when in attacking possession left us chasing shadows in defence.
All of a sudden, from looking likely winners we were clinging on and then Russell Martin threw a bucket of petrol onto the burning desire of many to see him take a manager enforced break from the action.
A veteran of over 200 games, promotions, relegation and those black pants, Martin is a real Norwich man but he’s suffering at the moment. He isn’t playing well, the system leaving him so exposed is exacerbating that and the stick he’s taking in accompaniment with a dip in confidence might just be affecting his decision making. Whatever the mitigating factors, the blind backpass – no, let’s be honest – the through ball he played for Milner was either disastrous or sublime depending on which end of your half and half scarf you were supporting at the time.
It was a howler. A blooper. A ricket of the highest order. The only possible saving grace was that it was Milner that read it and not somebody half decent, but even he managed to slot past the hesitant (understandable after Bournemouth?) Rudd.
So, there we have it. We’d somehow managed to contrive to be chasing the game just a tick after leading it by two goals. But chase it we did.
Despite our substitutions being largely ineffective we managed to stay in the game and when Benteke went haring off-side it gave us the opportunity to pump one last ball into the mixer. The ball was suitably launched forward, the heads went up and the second ball dropped on the edge of the area to….Bassong?….anyone but hi…..GOAL. We’d salvaged a point, the Barclay started tearing into the devastated Scousers, the world had regained some semblance of normality and we’d reflect on this as being one of the games of our lives and we’d drink and reflect in the hostelries of Norwich in a stupor of disappointment and relief.
Or we would have done had Adam Lallana not shinned Robbie Brady’s awful header into the Carrow Road turf sending it looping over the stranded Rudd and into the corner of the net. 4-5.
The stupor of disappointment and relief was replaced by a crimson mist of anger and vitriol – much of which was aimed at our beleaguered and much-maligned skipper.
He didn’t have a great game irrespective of the backpass, he hasn’t been playing well and even the goals have dried up. Was he solely to blame for our defeat? Of course not and there are plenty of culprits who contributed to our downfall if you really want to go looking for them. His mistake was the stand-out one of the match, it isn’t the first time that he’s come up short either but some of the reaction was, and is, way beyond the pale.
Alex Neil does not suffer fools and neither does he pay much heed to reputation – look at the way we beat Manchester United, were robbed at Man City and took the game to Liverpool – and that speaks volumes about his decision to keep picking Russell Martin. This might well be the point where Martin gets rested, but Neil is his own man and if he does choose to drop the skipper it will be his decision rather than any swell of ill-feeling in the crowd breaching this particular dam.
Either way, one day in the future we’ll all be telling someone that we were there for “that” game, like the Fashanu match, like the Middlesbrough comeback, Colchester and Wembley.
OTBC
—————————-
If you’re not bored of my drivel already, here is a post I made on Social Media dealing solely with the Russell Martin situation:
Football fans are fickle. It doesn’t matter who they support, it’s the nature of the beast. It’s sad when anger and frustration manifests itself into something personal but you’ll see it time and time again and at every club. We’ve been here before with Doherty, Worthington, Hughton and plenty of others. Is Russ as bad as people are claiming? No, certainly not. The guy is an international footballer and of all the people I see publicly haranguing him, I don’t know any of them with an international cap. Is he struggling for form? Definitely. He isn’t playing well and he’d be the first to admit it. Are those blaming him for everything from every goal we concede to the hole in the Ozone layer helping? No. If anybody thinks that people writing, saying or shouting negative stuff about you doesn’t have SOME impact on their self-esteem and confidence, they’re mental. Will that make them stop? No.
Realistically, I’d like to see him given a break. As with Ruddy, it’s the best way to demonstrate that the apparent problems are down to more than an individual. Rudd is shipping goals just like Ruddy did, the reason? Are they both crap? No. They have both suffered for the defence in front of them, who in turn suffer from a lack of protection in front of them. It’s a collective issue and one directly aligned to the style of play we’ve chosen to pursue. It’s a style that gives us a great chance of wining games but also leaves us, at times, massively exposed at the back.
The thing is, Russ won’t want a break, he won’t want taking out of the firing line or to “be protected”; he’ll want to get back out there and prove that he is every bit good enough.
It’s a conundrum for Alex Neil, he obviously has faith as he keeps picking him and keeps him as his skipper.
That so many people think they know better than Alex is, if it wasn’t so conceited, funny. The startling lack of criticism of him when he is the guy consistently picking Russ is also laughable. But…Alex is still riding a wave of goodwill following Wembley; if we lose our next 3 or 4 and find ourselves in the drop zone, watch the difference in attitude towards him too.
Bottom line this week is that Russ made an awful, awful mistake. We went on to lose the game by the odd goal and as such that mistake has been magnified. He will probably pay for that with his place for the next game but Alex is his own man and I wouldn’t be surprised AT ALL to see him back his man and stick with him. Whether that would do either any favours with the fans is open to debate!!!